
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Ever since William Seward purchased the territory from Russia in 1867, Alaska and its lands have captured the imagination of Americans across the country.
Over the years, this fascination with Alaska has played out in the White House and in the halls of Congress. Presidential proclamations and Acts of Congress have created a body of federal public lands in Alaska cherished by all Americans.
Read on to learn more about the fascinating history of public lands in Alaska.
From
the time of John Muir’s and Bob Marshall’s trips in Alaska, pioneer conservationists
there sought stronger protection for the unsurpassed wilderness of “The Great
Land.”
In
the decades prior to enactment of the 1964 Wilderness Act, no ‘primitive areas’
or ‘wilderness areas’ were designated administratively by the Forest Service
in the two national forests in southeast Alaska. Because the Wilderness Act
itself only designated forest lands with prior administrative protection,
no areas in Alaska came into the National Wilderness Preservation System in
1964. However, the Act did require wilderness reviews for the many large roadless
areas and the roadless islands in the existing national parks and national
wildlife refuges.
Not
daunted by the lack of foresight by Forest Service officials, conservationists
in Southeast Alaska prepared their own citizen wilderness proposals, but a
generally hostile congressional delegation made approval seem a distant dream.
Priority attention had to be given to the constant fight to turn back massive
timber sales on the Tongass National Forest.
The
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.
Land use decisions in Alaska were bound up with the aboriginal
land claims of Alaskan Natives, and with the pressures resulting from the
1968 Prudhoe Bay oil discovery and plans for the Trans Alaska pipeline.
When
the Alaska Natives filed suit over their land claims, Interior Secretary Stewart
Udall imposed a land freeze, stopping land transfer (including those to meet
the State’s highly generous statehood grant of 104,000,000 acres). To get
the oil flowing and additional state land selections transferred, the Udall
Land Freeze had to be lifted, and that could only occur when Congress resolved
the Native land claims issue.
The
upshot was, by 1970, huge pressures from the governor and the State of Alaska,
the oil industry and developers of all stripes to pass an Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act to implement a settlement that had been negotiated with Native
organizations.
A
few conservationists in Alaska and in Washington D.C. realized that when the
Udall land freeze was removed, the slicing up of Alaska lands the 375,000,000
million acres of Alaska almost entirely owned then by all the American
people would surpass the frenzy of the 19th-century Oklahoma land rush.
Where or when, in the rush to transfer millions of acres of lands out of the
federal estate, would anyone speak up for the national interest in reserving
some great expanses of Alaska as national parks, national wildlife refuges,
national wild and scenic rivers, and as wilderness?
"D-2”
and The Alaska Coalition.
Pressed into action by Alaska conservation leaders, The Wilderness
Society and the Sierra Club formed the core of a new ‘Alaska Coalition’ created
to deal with this question of the ‘national interest lands’ in Alaska, in
the context of the Native claims settlement. In a come-from-behind effort,
the Coalition urged Congress to include in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement
Act a provision requiring protection of some large expanses of federal land
for more detailed study as potential parks, refuges and wilderness areas.
Against
all odds, the Alaska Coalition pushed this amendment to a vote on the House
floor in 1970, where their ‘Udall-Saylor National Interest Lands Amendment”
was defeated, 178-to-217. Though defeated, the impressive size of the favorable
vote helped create political momentum for the national interest lands idea.
Building on a similar idea in the Senate version of the bill, a national interest
lands provision was incorporated in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
of 1971.
This
“D-2” provision—so-called from section 17(d)(2) of the law—required that up
to 80,000,000 acres of federal lands in Alaska identified by the Secretary
of the Interior as having highest values for park, refuge and wilderness purposes,
were to be reserved and given interim protection until Congress could act
on the results of more detailed studies. The 80,000,000 acres were given special
congressional protection until December 1978.
During
the mid-1970s, the federal agencies undertook intensive land-use studies all
across Alaska to equip the Secretary of the Interior, Republican Rogers C.B.
Morton, to fulfill the D-2 mandate.
In parallel with those efforts, Alaska and national conservation leaders
mounted an enormous effort to develop their own comprehensive and detailed
set of park, refuge, wild river and wilderness proposals, designed on a scale
to match Alaska’s vast and incomparable wilderness resources.
The question was, how to get this unprecedented set of proposals enacted
into law?
Conservation
leaders realized such a visionary program would draw powerful opposition from
Alaska boosters, the governor, the Alaska congressional delegation and every
conceivable development interest, from oil to mining. To get their package
through Congress would require a far larger, more cohesive effort than anything
America’s conservation movement had ever imagined. Led by Chuck Clusen, the
Alaska Coalition reemerged, uniting Alaskan and national conservation groups,
which pooled unprecedented resources for this unified campaign.
The
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act.
In 1977, with the citizen-developed Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act (ANILCA) introduced in Congress, an extraordinary constellation
of leaders came together behind it:
The campaign to pass ANILCA—the largest, most cohesive campaign in the history of the environmental movement to that time—raged through the late 1970s.[i] Udall, Seiberling and their conservationist supporters—and President Carter—triumphed in passing a very strong bill in the House in 1978 by a margin of 9-to-1. [It is noteworthy that this bill, passed in another era of energy concerns, would have permanently blocked oil drilling by designating all of the Arctic Refuge coastal plain as Wilderness.] When a Senate fillibuster blocked this bill, with the interim protection of the D-2 lands set to expire in December, 1978, President Carter and Secretary Andrus took executive action to protect them indefinitely.
In
1979 the House again passed a very strong bill, but the Senate committee approved
a less desirable version, giving weaker protection to smaller areas.
[For example, this version left the 1.5 million acre Arctic coastal
plain open to the possibility of oil drilling.] When Carter and the Alaska
Coalition won the first of a projected series of Senate floor votes on amendments
to strengthen and expand the inadequate committee bill, Senate leaders pulled
the bill from further floor action. Instead, they convened behind-closed-door
negotiations dominated by the Alaska delegation.
The
Senate-passed bill that resulted was still unsatisfactory to conservationists,
who worked with Reps. Udall and Seiberling to prepare a much stronger substitute
version they hoped to have the House adopt when it received the Senate-passed
bill. However, the 1980 election
intervened and Ronald Reagan defeated Jimmy Carter. It was obvious that Reagan
would side with opponents of the Alaska Lands bill.
So, the House leaders, conservationist coalition and Carter had no
real choice but to accept the weaker—but still historic—Senate version.
On
December 2, 1980, President Carter signed the Alaska National Interest Lands
Act. The Act designated some
55 million acres of wilderness, more than doubled the size of the National
Wilderness Preservation System. Vast
new wilderness areas were designated in existing and new national parks (32,355,000
acres in eight park units) and in existing and new national wildlife refuges
(18,560,000 acres in 13 refuges). In
a particularly hard-fought victory, long-delayed wilderness protection was
provided at last for national forest land in Southeast Alaska (5,362,000 acres
in 14 wilderness areas on the Tongass National Forest).
On
its tenth anniversary, the late T. H. Watkins wrote that the Alaska Lands
Act:
… was at once one of the noblest and most comprehensive legislative
acts in American history, because, with the scratch of the presidential pen
that signed it, the act set aside more wild country than had been preserved
anywhere in the world up to that time—104.3 million acres.
By itself, the Alaska Lands Act stood as a ringing validation of the
best of what the conservation movement had stood for in the century since
Henry David Thoreau had walked so thoughtfully in the woods of Walden Pond.[ii]
* Excerpted from Doug Scott's "A Wilderness Forever Future: A Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System," to be published soon by the Pew Wilderness Center and The Wilderness Society.
[i] For
a detailed journalistic account of that campaign, see Robert Cahn, “The
Fight to Save Wilderness Alaska,” 1982, booklet published by the National
Audubon Society.
For a first-hand account, see my “In the National Interest,” Sierra, Vol. 76, No. 1 (January-February 1991), p. 40. For an appraisal 10 years later, see T. H. Watkins, “The Perils of Expedience,” Wilderness, Vol. 54, No. 191 (Winter 1990), p. 22.
[ii] T.H. Watkins, “Alaska and the Weight of History,” in Celebrating Wild Alaska: Twenty Years of the Alaska Lands Act, booklet published by the Natural Resources Defense Council and Alaska Wilderness League (2000), frontispiece [reprinting 1990 essay].